1. P. Mestres, J. Cortés, and E.D. Sontag. Neural network-based universal formulas for control. 2025. Note: Submitted. Also arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24744. Keyword(s): control-Lyapunov functions, control barrier functions, universal formulas, neural networks. Abstract:

   We study the problem of designing a controller that satisfies an arbitrary number of affine inequalities at every point in the state space. This is motivated by the use of guardrails in autonomous systems. Indeed, a variety of key control objectives, such as stability, safety, and input saturation, are guaranteed by closed-loop systems whose controllers satisfy such inequalities. Many works in the literature design such controllers as the solution to a state-dependent quadratic program (QP) whose constraints are precisely the inequalities. When the input dimension and number of constraints are high, computing a solution of this QP in real time can become computationally burdensome. Additionally, the solution of such optimization problems is not smooth in general, which can degrade the performance of the system. This paper provides a novel method to design a smooth controller that satisfies an arbitrary number of affine constraints. This why we refer to it as a universal formula for control. The controller is given at every state as the minimizer of a strictly convex function. To avoid computing the minimizer of such function in real time, we introduce a method based on neural networks (NN) to approximate the controller. Remarkably, this NN can be used to solve the controller design problem for any task with less than a fixed input dimension and number of affine constraints, and is completely independent of the state dimension. Additionally, we show that the NN-based controller only needs to be trained with datapoints from a compact set in the state space, which significantly simplifies the training process. Various simulations showcase the performance of the proposed solution, and also show that the NN-based controller can be used to warmstart an optimization scheme that refines the approximation of the true controller in real time, significantly reducing the computational cost compared to a generic initialization.




2. E.D. Sontag. Some remarks on gradient dominance and LQR policy optimization. arXiv, 2025. [doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.10452] Keyword(s): gradient dominance, gradient flows, LQR, reinforcement learning, machine learning, artificial intelligence, optimal control. Abstract:

   Solutions of optimization problems, including policy optimization in reinforcement learning, typically rely upon some variant of gradient descent. There has been much recent work in the machine learning, control, and optimization communities applying the Polyak-�ojasiewicz Inequality (PLI) to such problems in order to establish an exponential rate of convergence (a.k.a. ``linear convergence'' in the local-iteration language of numerical analysis) of loss functions to their minima under the gradient flow. Often, as is the case of policy iteration for the continuous-time LQR problem, this rate vanishes for large initial conditions, resulting in a mixed globally linear / locally exponential behavior. This is in sharp contrast with the discrete-time LQR problem, where there is global exponential convergence. That gap between CT and DT behaviors motivates the search for various generalized PLI-like conditions, and this paper addresses that topic. Moreover, these generalizations are key to understanding the transient and asymptotic effects of errors in the estimation of the gradient, errors which might arise from adversarial attacks, wrong evaluation by an oracle, early stopping of a simulation, inaccurate and very approximate digital twins, stochastic computations (algorithm ``reproducibility''), or learning by sampling from limited data. We describe an ``input to state stability'' (ISS) analysis of this issue. We also discuss convergence and PLI-like properties of ``linear feedforward neural networks'' in feedback control. Much of the work described here was done in collaboration with Arthur Castello B. de Oliveira, Leilei Cui, Zhong-Ping Jiang, and Milad Siami. This is a short paper summarizing the slides presented at my keynote at the 2025 L4DC (Learning for Dynamics \& Control Conference) in Ann Arbor, Michigan, 05 June 2025. A partial bibliography has been added.

1. A.C.B de Olivera, L. Cui, and E. D. Sontag. Remarks on the Polyak-Lojasiewicz inequality and the convergence of gradient systems. In Proc. 64th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2025. Note: Submitted. Keyword(s): gradient dominance, gradient flows, LQR, reinforcement learning. Abstract:

   This work explores generalizations of the Polyak-Lojasiewicz inequality (PLI) and their implications for the convergence behavior of gradient flows in optimization problems. Motivated by the continuous-time linear quadratic regulator (CT-LQR) policy optimization problem -- where only a weaker version of the PLI is characterized in the literature -- this work shows that while weaker conditions are sufficient for global convergence to, and optimality of the set of critical points of the cost function, the "profile" of the gradient flow solution can change significantly depending on which "flavor" of inequality the cost satisfies. After a general theoretical analysis, we focus on fitting the CT-LQR policy optimization problem to the proposed framework, showing that, in fact, it can never satisfy a PLI in its strongest form. We follow up our analysis with a brief discussion on the difference between continuous- and discrete-time LQR policy optimization, and end the paper with some intuition on the extension of this framework to optimization problems with L1 regularization and solved through proximal gradient flows.




2. C. Darken, M.J. Donahue, L. Gurvits, and E.D. Sontag. Rate of approximation results motivated by robust neural network learning. In COLT '93: Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theory, New York, NY, USA, pages 303-309, 1993. ACM Press. [doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/168304.168357] Keyword(s): machine learning, neural networks, optimization problems, approximation theory.

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders.

This document was translated from BibT_EX by bibtex2html