BACK TO INDEX

Publications of Eduardo D. Sontag jointly with L. Cui
Articles in journal or book chapters
  1. L. Cui, Z.P. Jiang, E.D. Sontag, and R.D. Braatz. Perturbed gradient descent algorithms are small-disturbance input-to-state stable. Automatica, 2025. Note: Submitted. Also arXiv:2507.02131. [PDF] [doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.02131] Keyword(s): Input-to-state stability (ISS), gradient systems, policy optimization, linear quadratic regulator (LQR).
    Abstract:
    This article investigates the robustness of gradient descent algorithms under perturbations. The concept of small-disturbance input-to-state stability (ISS) for discrete-time nonlinear dynamical systems is introduced, along with its Lyapunov characterization. The conventional linear \emph{Polyak-\L{}ojasiewicz} (PL) condition is then extended to a nonlinear version, and it is shown that the gradient descent algorithm is small-disturbance ISS provided the objective function satisfies the generalized nonlinear PL condition. This small-disturbance ISS property guarantees that the gradient descent algorithm converges to a small neighborhood of the optimum under sufficiently small perturbations. As a direct application of the developed framework, we demonstrate that the LQR cost satisfies the generalized nonlinear PL condition, thereby establishing that the policy gradient algorithm for LQR is small-disturbance ISS. Additionally, other popular policy gradient algorithms, including natural policy gradient and Gauss-Newton method, are also proven to be small-disturbance ISS.


  2. L. Cui, Z.P. Jiang, and E. D. Sontag. Small-disturbance input-to-state stability of perturbed gradient flows: Applications to LQR problem. Systems and Control Letters, 188:105804, 2024. [PDF] [doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2024.105804] Keyword(s): machine learning, artificial intelligence, gradient systems, direct optimization, input-to-state stability, ISS.
    Abstract:
    This paper studies the effect of perturbations on the gradient flow of a general constrained nonlinear programming problem, where the perturbation may arise from inaccurate gradient estimation in the setting of data-driven optimization. Under suitable conditions on the objective function, the perturbed gradient flow is shown to be small-disturbance input-to-state stable (ISS), which implies that, in the presence of a small-enough perturbation, the trajectory of the perturbed gradient flow must eventually enter a small neighborhood of the optimum. This work was motivated by the question of robustness of direct methods for the linear quadratic regulator problem, and specifically the analysis of the effect of perturbations caused by gradient estimation or round-off errors in policy optimization. Interestingly, we show small-disturbance ISS for three of the most common optimization algorithms: standard gradient flow, natural gradient flow, and Newton gradient flow.


Conference articles
  1. L. Cui, Z.P. Jiang, and E. D. Sontag. Small-covariance noise-to-state stability of stochastic systems and its applications to stochastic gradient dynamics. In 2026 American Control Conference (ACC), 2026. Note: Submitted. Also arXiv:2509.24277. [PDF] [doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.24277] Keyword(s): noise to state stability, input to state stability, stochastic systems.
    Abstract:
    This paper studies gradient dynamics subject to additive stochastic noise, which may arise from sources such as stochastic gradient estimation, measurement noise, or stochastic sampling errors. To analyze the robustness of such stochastic gradient systems, the concept of small-covariance noise-to-state stability (NSS) is introduced, along with a Lyapunov-based characterization. Furthermore, the classical Polyak–Lojasiewicz (PL) condition on the objective function is generalized to the $\mathcal{K}$-PL condition via comparison functions, thereby extending its applicability to a broader class of optimization problems. It is shown that the stochastic gradient dynamics exhibit small-covariance NSS if the objective function satisfies the $\mathcal{K}$-PL condition and possesses a globally Lipschitz continuous gradient. This result implies that the trajectories of stochastic gradient dynamics converge to a neighborhood of the optimum with high probability, with the size of the neighborhood determined by the noise covariance. Moreover, if the $\mathcal{K}$-PL condition is strengthened to a $\mathcal{K}_\infty$-PL condition, the dynamics are NSS; whereas if it is weakened to a general positive-definite-PL condition, the dynamics exhibit integral NSS. The results further extend to objectives without globally Lipschitz gradients through appropriate step-size tuning. The proposed framework is further applied to the robustness analysis of policy optimization for the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and logistic regression.


  2. A.C.B de Oliveira, L. Cui, and E. D. Sontag. Remarks on the Polyak-Lojasiewicz inequality and the convergence of gradient systems. In Proc. 64th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2025. Note: To appear. Extended version in arXiv:2503.23641. [PDF] [doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23641] Keyword(s): machine learning, artificial intelligence, gradient dominance, gradient flows, LQR, reinforcement learning.
    Abstract:
    This work explores generalizations of the Polyak-Lojasiewicz inequality (PLI) and their implications for the convergence behavior of gradient flows in optimization problems. Motivated by the continuous-time linear quadratic regulator (CT-LQR) policy optimization problem -- where only a weaker version of the PLI is characterized in the literature -- this work shows that while weaker conditions are sufficient for global convergence to, and optimality of the set of critical points of the cost function, the "profile" of the gradient flow solution can change significantly depending on which "flavor" of inequality the cost satisfies. After a general theoretical analysis, we focus on fitting the CT-LQR policy optimization problem to the proposed framework, showing that, in fact, it can never satisfy a PLI in its strongest form. We follow up our analysis with a brief discussion on the difference between continuous- and discrete-time LQR policy optimization, and end the paper with some intuition on the extension of this framework to optimization problems with L1 regularization and solved through proximal gradient flows.



BACK TO INDEX




Disclaimer:

This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders.




Last modified: Thu Oct 23 10:40:03 2025
Author: sontag.


This document was translated from BibTEX by bibtex2html