| Publications about 'gene regulation' |
| Articles in journal or book chapters |
| Metastatic melanoma presents a formidable challenge in oncology due to its high invasiveness and resistance to current treatments. Central to its ability to metastasize is the Notch signaling pathway, which, when activated through direct cell-cell interactions, propels cells into a metastatic state through mechanisms akin to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). While the upregulation of miR-222 has been identified as a critical step in this metastatic progression, the mechanism through which this upregulation persists in the absence of active Notch signaling remains unclear. Here we introduce a dynamical system model that integrates miR-222 gene regulation with histone feedback mechanisms. Through computational analysis, we delineate the non-linear decision boundaries that govern melanoma cell fate transitions, taking into account the dynamics of Notch signaling and the role of epigenetic modifications. Our approach highlights the critical interplay between Notch signaling pathways and epigenetic regulation in dictating the fate of melanoma cells. |
| Understanding how opposing regulatory factors shape gene expression is essential for understanding complex biological systems. A motivating observation, drawn from cancer epigenetics, is that removing an activating factor can sometimes lead to higher, not lower, expression of a gene that is also subject to a repressing factor. Prior theoretical work explained this counterintuitive behavior by competition of repressors and activators for genomic binding sites. However, it has been difficult to test this directly in natural systems, where layers of regulation obscure causal relationships. This paper introduces a fully synthetic, tunable genetic platform in a prokaryotic model system that reconstitutes this competition mechanism in a controlled and isolated setting. The genetic platform contains a target gene with binding sites for both an activator and a repressor, together with separate overlapping decoy binding sites for the same regulators. Activator and repressor functions are implemented using CRISPRa and CRISPRi, which permit independent control of regulator expression levels, design of the binding sites, and modulation of the binding affinities. Using this minimal system, we demonstrate that increasing activator expression level can reduce expression of the target gene when both regulators are present, consistent with the hypothesis that additional activator molecules displace the repressor from decoy sites, which becomes available to repress the target. By demonstrating how competition for genomic binding sites can invert expected regulatory responses, this synthetic framework provides a system for understanding similar paradoxical behaviors in natural regulatory networks and establishes a foundation for future studies in more complex mammalian contexts. |
| Understanding how opposing regulatory factors shape gene expression is essential for interpreting complex biological systems. A motivating observation, drawn from cancer epigenetics, is that removing an activating factor can sometimes lead to higher, not lower, expression of a gene that is also subject to repression. This counterintuitive behavior suggests that competition between activators and repressors for limited genomic binding sites may produce unexpected transcriptional outcomes. Prior theoretical work proposed this mechanism, but it has been difficult to test directly in natural systems, where layers of chromatin regulation obscure causal relationships. This paper introduces a fully synthetic, tunable genetic platform in a prokaryotic model system that isolates this competition mechanism in a clean and interpretable setting. The engineered construct contains a target gene with binding sites for both an activator and a repressor, together with a separate decoy region that carries overlapping binding sites for the same regulators. Activator and repressor functions are implemented using CRISPRa and CRISPRi, which permit independent control of regulator expression levels and binding affinities. Using this minimal system, the paper shows that increasing activator expression can reduce expression of the target gene when both regulators are present, consistent with the prediction that additional activator molecules displace the repressor from decoy sites and allow it to more effectively repress the target. By demonstrating how competition alone can invert expected regulatory responses, this synthetic framework provides a validated model for understanding similar paradoxical behaviors in natural regulatory networks and establishes a foundation for future studies in more complex mammalian contexts. |
| Cells respond to biochemical and physical internal as well as external signals. These signals can be broadly classified into two categories: (a) ``actionable'' or ``reference'' inputs that should elicit appropriate biological or physical responses such as gene expression or motility, and (b) ``disturbances'' or ``perturbations'' that should be ignored or actively filtered-out. These disturbances might be exogenous, such as binding of nonspecific ligands, or endogenous, such as variations in enzyme concentrations or gene copy numbers. In this context, the term robustness describes the capability to produce appropriate responses to reference inputs while at the same time being insensitive to disturbances. These two objectives often conflict with each other and require delicate design trade-offs. Indeed, natural biological systems use complicated and still poorly understood control strategies in order to finely balance the goals of responsiveness and robustness. A better understanding of such natural strategies remains an important scientific goal in itself and will play a role in the construction of synthetic circuits for therapeutic and biosensing applications. A prototype problem in robustly responding to inputs is that of ``robust tracking'', defined by the requirement that some designated internal quantity (for example, the level of expression of a reporter protein) should faithfully follow an input signal while being insensitive to an appropriate class of perturbations. Control theory predicts that a certain type of motif, called integral feedback, will help achieve this goal, and this motif is, in fact, a necessary feature of any system that exhibits robust tracking. Indeed, integral feedback has always been a key component of electrical and mechanical control systems, at least since the 18th century when James Watt employed the centrifugal governor to regulate steam engines. Motivated by this knowledge, biological engineers have proposed various designs for biomolecular integral feedback control mechanisms. However, practical and quantitatively predictable implementations have proved challenging, in part due to the difficulty in obtaining accurate models of transcription, translation, and resource competition in living cells, and the stochasticity inherent in cellular reactions. These challenges prevent first-principles rational design and parameter optimization. In this work, we exploit the versatility of an Escherichia coli cell-free transcription-translation (TXTL) to accurately design, model and then build, a synthetic biomolecular integral controller that precisely controls the expression of a target gene. To our knowledge, this is the first design of a functioning gene network that achieves the goal of making gene expression track an externally imposed reference level, achieves this goal even in the presence of disturbances, and whose performance quantitatively agrees with mathematical predictions. |
| Conference articles |
| Integral feedback can help achieve robust tracking independently of external disturbances. Motivated by this knowledge, biological engineers have proposed various designs of biomolecular integral feedback controllers to regulate biological processes. In this paper, we theoretically analyze the operation of a particular synthetic biomolecular integral controller, which we have recently proposed and implemented experimentally. Using a combination of methods, ranging from linearized analysis to sum-of-squares (SOS) Lyapunov functions, we demonstrate that, when the controller is operated in closed-loop, it is capable of providing integral corrections to the concentration of an output species in such a manner that the output tracks a reference signal linearly over a large dynamic range. We investigate the output dependency on the reaction parameters through sensitivity analysis, and quantify performance using control theory metrics to characterize response properties, thus providing clear selection guidelines for practical applications. We then demonstrate the stable operation of the closed-loop control system by constructing quartic Lyapunov functions using SOS optimization techniques, and establish global stability for a unique equilibrium. Our analysis suggests that by incorporating effective molecular sequestration, a biomolecular closed-loop integral controller that is capable of robustly regulating gene expression is feasible. |
| This work is concerned with the study of the robustness and fragility of gene regulation networks to variability in the timescales of the distinct biological processes involved. It explores and compares two methods: introducing asynchronous updates in a Boolean model, or integrating the Boolean rules in a continuous, piecewise linear model. As an example, the segment polarity network of the fruit fly is analyzed. A theoretical characterization is given of the model's ability to predict the correct development of the segmented embryo, in terms of the specific timescales of the various regulation interactions. |
This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders.
This document was translated from BibTEX by bibtex2html